An Excerpt from “Refuting Romanism: A Logical and Scriptural Treatise” (HRDIII)

This is a little post I enjoyed. One could also argue legitimately that transsubtantiation is a denial of Christ coming in the flesh because how could His physical human body (I’m not talking about His deity) be in many places at the same time? He would not truly be human in His humanity.

********************

See also:

The AntiChrist Part 8 : How Does the Papacy Subtly Deny that Christ Came in the Flesh?

A : A

crackersz

[Refuting Romanism: A Logical & Scriptural Treatise is a short book I intend to publish through Nook publishers. I aim to show that the Catechism of the Catholic Church (or CCC) is self-contradictory, contradicts the Scriptures, and therefore cannot be the Word of God.]

Transubstantiation, Christology & Anthropology

The CCC’s contradictions also find articulation in its doctrine of transubstantiation, a doctrine which stands in contradiction to the CCC’s anthropology. For according to the CCC,1 death came into the world through sin. “Man’s sins,” it says elsewhere, “following on original sin, are punishable by death.”2 In paragraph 1008, the CCC states further that “death is a consequence of sin.” Finally, the CCC explains that

Death is the end of man’s earthly pilgrimage…when “the single course of our earthly life” is completed, we shall not return to other earthly lives: “It is…

View original post 619 more words

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under False teachings

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s